Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor | |
Mei, Yifeng1,4; Zhao, Mingzhao1,2; Lu, Bona1; Chen, Sheng3; Wang, Wei1,4![]() | |
2017-04-01 | |
Source Publication | PARTICUOLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 1674-2001 |
Volume | 31Pages:42-48 |
Abstract | Two modes of gas-solid riser operation, i.e., fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) and circulating fluidized bed combustor (CFBC), have been recognized in literature; particularly in the understanding of choking phenomena. This work compares these two modes of operation through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. In CFD simulations, the different operations are represented by fixing appropriate boundary conditions: solids flux or solids inventory. It is found that the FCC and CFBC modes generally have the same dependence of solids flux on the mean solids volume fraction or solids inventory. However, during the choking transition, the FCC mode of operation needs more time to reach a steady state; thus the FCC system may have insufficient time to respond to valve adjustments or flow state change, leading to the choking. The difference between FCC and CFBC systems is more pronounced for the systems with longer risers. A more detailed investigation of these two modes of riser operation may require a three-dimensional full loop simulation with dynamic valve adjustment. (C) 2016 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Keyword | Fluidization Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation Fluid Catalytic Cracking Circulating Fluidized Bed Choking |
Subtype | Article |
WOS Headings | Science & Technology ; Technology |
DOI | 10.1016/j.partic.2016.05.007 |
Indexed By | SCI |
Language | 英语 |
WOS Keyword | Multiscale Cfd ; Fast Fluidization ; Bed Boiler ; Full-loop ; Flow ; Simulation ; Choking ; Hydrodynamics ; Suspensions ; Particles |
WOS Research Area | Engineering ; Materials Science |
WOS Subject | Engineering, Chemical ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary |
Funding Organization | National Natural Science Foundation of China(91334204 ; Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA07080100) ; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China(2012CB215003) ; 21576263) |
WOS ID | WOS:000397695500006 |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | 期刊论文 |
Identifier | http://ir.ipe.ac.cn/handle/122111/22149 |
Collection | 多相复杂系统国家重点实验室 |
Affiliation | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Proc Engn, State Key Lab Multiphase Complex Syst, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China 2.Sichuan Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China 3.China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Heavy Oil Proc, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China 4.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Mei, Yifeng,Zhao, Mingzhao,Lu, Bona,et al. Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor[J]. PARTICUOLOGY,2017,31:42-48. |
APA | Mei, Yifeng,Zhao, Mingzhao,Lu, Bona,Chen, Sheng,&Wang, Wei.(2017).Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor.PARTICUOLOGY,31,42-48. |
MLA | Mei, Yifeng,et al."Numerical comparison of two modes of gas-solid riser operation: Fluid catalytic cracking vs CFB combustor".PARTICUOLOGY 31(2017):42-48. |
Files in This Item: | ||||||
File Name/Size | DocType | Version | Access | License | ||
Numerical comparison(1916KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | Application Full Text |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment